Latin America, Women’s Rights and Zika; governments response add to women’s burden

17 March, 2016

Women march in El Salvador for International Women’s Day. Photograph: ACDATEE

The mosquito borne Zika virus has become a primary concern for Latin America, reigniting debates around birth control and abortion in the region, and around to what extent government’s recommended methods of prevention, mainly addressed to women, meet the reality of women’s control.

Following the first local transmission of Zika in Brazil in May 2015, the virus has spread to more than 20 countries in the Americas, causing the World Health Organisation to declare a global public health emergency. The Zika virus has been linked to a steep increase in reports of microcephaly, a brain defect in babies.

Evidence of the virus is clear in Central America, where the first local transmission was reported in November 2015. The countries thought to be affected in Central America are: Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has issued a ‘Level 2’ Alert for these countries, suggesting they practise enhanced precautions.

Due to its mild symptoms, the Zika virus was previously viewed as a relatively harmless condition. However, the most recent epidemic has raised concerns that the virus is linked to foetal abnormalities, highlighting the particular risk of infection to pregnant women. In response to this development, Latin America has been considering actions to reduce the incidence of Zika in pregnant women and therefore minimise any linked abnormalities in children.

Initial responses to the outbreak and the link with microcephaly led some governments to advise against women becoming pregnant. Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador and El Salvador all took this approach. Colombia advised women to avoid becoming pregnant for six to eight months, while El Salvador called for women to avoid pregnancy for two years. Not only does this squarely place the burden of public health responsibility onto women, but it also assumes that women have the choice in the first place.

According to Amnesty International, over 50% of pregnancies in Latin America are unplanned. Rates of teenage pregnancy in the region, and particularly in Central America, are also high. Access to sex education and contraception is inconsistent and often insufficient. Despite efforts to increase access to contraception over the past decade, a significant unmet need exists, especially for those from poor and rural backgrounds. Many Latin American countries are short of basic contraceptive supplies for women. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Honduras all saw clinics run out of basic contraceptive supplies in 2015.

Advising women to avoid becoming pregnant also ignores the deep-rooted culture of machismo and violence in the region, which has fostered exceptionally high rates of rape and sexual violence. Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador have seen some of the highest rates of femicide and sexual violence in the world. These countries, along with others in Central America, have suffered high rates of gang-related violence, human trafficking, domestic violence and femicide.

Indeed, high rates of violence and poverty have driven large numbers of women to flee the region, many to the United States. Numerous reports suggest that women are at great risk of sexual violence when they migrate, with Amnesty International suggesting that 80% of Central American women have been raped during their journey. It goes without saying that victims of rape have no choice in the matter of whether or not they become pregnant.

Yet highly restrictive abortion laws in the region often see victims of rape denied the right to a safe, legal abortion. Latin America has some of the most draconian abortion laws in the world. In Brazil, where Zika is most prevalent, abortion is only permissible in cases of rape, where the mother’s life is at risk or in the case of an anencephalic foetus. The recent Zika outbreak and the potential connection to microcephaly has sparked a wider debate around abortion laws in Latin America.

Women protest against El Salvador’s draconian law.
Photograph: Reuters

In Chile, Nicaragua and El Salvador, abortion is illegal in all circumstances. Victims of rape are denied access to an abortion. Pregnant women whose lives are in danger are denied access to an abortion. Women carrying deformed foetuses are denied access to abortion. Ironically, El Salvador, a country asking its female population to take responsibility for family planning for the next two years, denies those very same women the ability to access that right.

A number of recent cases in El Salvador, in which women suffering miscarriages or birth complications have faced lengthy prison sentences for murder, demonstrate the inhumanity of the country’s abortion laws. Many women in Central America are denied control over their own bodies, highlighting the very basic problem with asking them to be responsible for controlling the Zika outbreak through family planning.

Restrictive abortion laws may also see women who become pregnant in Zika affected areas more likely to access illegal abortions or suffer miscarriages which, in countries like El Salvador, can result in long prison sentences.

While sexual violence and restrictive abortion laws affect all women, there is no doubt that those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds are likely to be more exposed to the Zika virus and face fewer options once infected. Poorer women are less able to access contraception. They are likely to face higher exposure to the mosquito borne virus by living in less developed regions or substandard housing. They are less able to afford mosquito nets or repellent. They have less access to healthcare and cannot afford to travel to private clinics, which may be internationally located, for emergency contraception or abortions.

The Zika virus, and responses to it, have so far shone a light on the inadequacies of abortion and family planning laws in Latin America. El Salvador, in particular, has rightly faced significant criticism for suggesting women should be responsible for family planning in a context in which they cannot exercise choice.

Nevertheless, the Zika outbreak represents an opportunity for Latin America to review its own sexual health policies and address some long overdue issues, from access to contraception and abortion to a machismo culture that fosters sexual violence and discrimination. While worldwide attention is turned to the region, it is essential that the international community puts pressure on Latin America to address these issues.

Maisie Davies graduated with a degree in Politics and Social Policy from the University of Leeds and currently works as a service organiser and writer for Ubiqus. She has lived and travelled extensively in Latin America and has volunteered for a number of charities working in the region. She specialises in the topic of violence against women, particularly during conflict.

 

TAKE ACTION: 

You can write to your MEP to demand them to pressure El Salvador to change the legislation on abortion. MEPs can raise issues for the European Parliament to take action. You can use our model letter or write your own. Do not hesitate in contacting us at campaigns@cawn.org if unsure of which MEP to write to.

Posted in news | Comments (3)

3 Responses to “Latin America, Women’s Rights and Zika; governments response add to women’s burden”

  1. The Zika virus: government responses add to women’s burden | Red Pepper Says:

    […] issues. Visit the Central America Women's Network website to take action: scroll to the end of this article to download a model letter to […]

  2. Nicola Says:

    Excellent article, I am curious if similar cases of prison sentences being meted out to women found guilty of abortion occur in nicaragua and other Latin American countries, and if so why if the focus of campaigns so much on El Salvador? Does El Salvador have the worst track record for miscarriages of justice and sentencing of women in these situations?

  3. adminuser Says:

    El Salvador has a considerable bad record not just for banning abortion under all circumstances, but of actively prosecuting women under its legislation and of a long list of miscarriages of justice, in which women who have not even had an abortion have been condemned to up to 40 years in prison for aggravated murder. The situation in other Latin American countries is dire too, but records of bad legal practice don’t amount to the Salvadoran ones. The cases of Manuela and Beatriz have shown a Salvadoran government wilfully deaf to recommendations of Human Rights organisations and international bodies such as the IACHR, which costed the life of Manuela and it could have costed the life of Beatriz. This is by no means an argument for not campaigning in other countries – but the movement in El Salvador has been gaining weight, and there has been a move towards a possible change of discourse by a growing public.

Leave a Reply